ACT for America: Houston

mosque

To see the mosques and Islamic schools and businesses near you, go to: http://islamicfinder.org/ Enter your zipcode, and choose the 30 mile option- you may be surprised!

via Islamic finder — ACT for America Houston

Advertisements

Mark Levin TV

Bridgette Gabriel Explains: Islamic (Muslim) Extremism

The “Moderate Muslim” is the Islamic/Muslim Terrorist in waiting, conducting “The Cultural Jihad”.  Many Americans have been caught by surprise and some are completely unaware.  These individuals are currently in the United States as: doctors, lawyers, your neighbors and the person shopping where you shop.

The “Moderate Muslim” is the Islamic/Muslim Terrorist in waiting, and some very active in establishing an Islamic dominated America.

The tactics and strategies are already being implemented throughout Europe.  Denmark, France, Germany, Sweden and other European locations are suffering from these same efforts, even today!

“Muslims know how to use American laws against us, how to use our open-mindedness against us, they use buzzwords… tolerance, democracy, interfaith, diversity in order to “Con” Westerners. Muslim leaders have stated, “if we use these words, the Americans will be lapping from our hands like dogs, they will be disarmed.”

An essential and  key strategy is to get democratically elected Muslims in all levels in the west.  Another portion of the strategy is to have apointed Muslim interns in all offices in order to have an insightful eye as to how policy is written on the highest levels.” ~Bridgette Gabriel

United States: Refugee Acceptance Breakdown

Judge Jeanine Pirro explains the “Refugee”controversy in her “Opening Statement” (video above).

With all the opinions, both professional and amateur regarding the acceptance of  refugees into the United States, The Quantum Liberty Blog  has decided to provide you with an analytical breakdown on US policy and procedures for refugee status and acceptance onto United States soil.

The responsibility of the United States Government and the President of the United States, is to ultimately protect it’s citizens from all enemies, foreign and the domestic.

Outlined in the information to follow, is an overview of the policies and procedures to ensure the protection of the American people from any possible dangers, while ensuring the proper implementation of the Refugee and/or Asylum-Seeker process.

It is important to note:

Determinations by President respecting number of admissions for humanitarian concerns.  If the President determines, after appropriate consultation, that (1) an unforeseen emergency refugee situation exists, (2) the admission of certain refugees in response to the emergency refugee situation is justified by grave humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest, and (3) the admission to the United States of these refugees cannot be accomplished under subsection (a), the President may fix a number of refugees to be admitted to the United States during the succeeding period (not to exceed twelve months) in response to the emergency refugee situation and such admissions shall be allocated among refugees of special humanitarian concern to the United States in accordance with a determination made by the President after the appropriate consultation provided under this subsection.

Refugees Defined:

Under United States law, a refugee is someone who:

  • Is located outside of the United States
  • Is of special humanitarian concern to the United States
  • Demonstrates that they were persecuted or fear persecution due to race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group is not firmly resettled in another country
  • Is admissible to the United States

You (a bona fide refugee) must receive a referral to the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) for consideration as a refugee. (For more information on the referral criteria, see the USRAP Consultations and Worldwide Processing Priorities page).

***The question to note at this point:  Have ALL the refugees attempting to enter the United States, properly adhered to this important process?

If you receive a referral, you will receive help filling out your application and then be interviewed abroad by a USCIS officer who will determine whether you are eligible for refugee resettlement. For more information about eligibility, see our Refugee Eligibility Determination page.

Refugee Travel Outside the United States

If you have refugee status and want to travel outside the United States, you will need to obtain a Refugee Travel Document in order to return to the United States. If you do not obtain a Refugee Travel Document in advance of departure, you may be unable to re-enter the United States. If you return to the country from which you fled, you will have to explain how you were able to return safely.

Asylum-Seekers

Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.

The U.S. refugee protection system, while generous in many respects, has become less robust over the last two decades. The unique and often diverse needs of emerging refugee populations have exposed severe limitations in the standard resettlement approach. The system’s U.S. Refugee Admissions Program faces significant challenges, among which include heightened security reviews, inadequate coordination between government and NGOs, and unresolved policy tensions between the goals of protecting the most vulnerable.

Vital to the security of the American people and the sovereignty of the United States, this important issue must be resolved with great haste.  The rise of terroristic acts within United States borders is of great concern!  The American people, ultimately would like to experience the securities that are promised by the United States Constitution.

 

Chicago: Muslims Protest In Massive Force

Reminiscent of marches in Europe, thousands of Muslims protested in downtown Chicago, against America and Israel.  As seen in the video (above), this was a very well organized event.  Protesters carried, signs and waved flags representative of Iraq and Turkey.   What looked to be draped in a, Iraqi flag, was a coffin being carried by protesters.  (Please note: This event is from July 2014, which should cause any liberty minded American great concern as to the progression of organization after only 2 years have passed.)

Chants lead by a man over a loudspeaker included: “Muslim, Muslim don’t you cry…(inaudible response)”,  “Free, Free Palestine…(inaudible response)” along with other inaudible chants.  But regardless, the mood illustrated was a definite disdain with Israel and the United States.

We have learned and must acknowledge that Jihad comes in many forms and fashions.   As evidenced in this video, Jihad has definitely come to Chicago, Illinois

To further understand why massive protests are beginning now and have not been a notable occurrence in the past, we must first understand the ideology, when and how Muslims are called to Jihad.

Definitions to understand:

Mustahabb (Arabic: مستحبّ /mustaḥabb/, literally “recommended”) is an Islamic term referring to recommended, favored or virtuous actions. Mustahabb actions are those whose status of approval in Islamic law (ahkam) falls between mubah (neither encouraged nor discouraged) and wajib (compulsory).

Kafir (Arabic: كافر‎‎ kāfir; plural كفّار kuffār; feminine كافرة kāfirah) is an Arabic term (from the root K-F-R “to cover”) “unbeliever”, “disbeliever”, or “infidel”. It is used as a derogatory term.

In Islam, shirk (Arabic: شرك‎ širk) is the sin of practicing idolatry or polytheism, i.e. the deification or worship of anyone or anything other than the singular God i.e. Allah. Literally, it means the establishment of “partners” placed beside God. It is the vice that is opposed to the virtue of Tawhid (monotheism).

Fard or its synonym wājib (واجب) is one of the five types of Ahkam into which Fiqh categorizes acts of every Muslim. The Hanafi Fiqh however makes a distinction between Wajib and Fard, the latter being obligatory and the former merely necessary.

Jihad is of various kinds, some of which are obligatory upon everyone who is accountable, and some are obligatory upon the community as a whole.  if some people undertake them then the rest are relieved of the obligation. And some kinds of jihad are mustahabb.
Jihad al-nafs (jihad against one’s self) and jihad al-Shaytaan (jihad against the Shaytaan) are obligatory upon everyone who is accountable. Jihad against the munaafiqeen (hypocrites), kaafirs (disbelievers) and leaders of oppression and innovation is obligatory upon the community as a whole. Physical jihad (i.e. fighting) against the kaafirs may become an individual obligation upon everyone who is able to do it in certain circumstances, which will be described below.
Ibn al-Qayyim said:
Once this is understood, then jihad is of four kinds: Jihad al-nafs (jihad against one’s self), jihad al-Shaytaan (jihad against the Shaytaan), jihad against the kaafirs and jihad against the hypocrites. 

Jihad al-nafs (jihad against one’s self) is of four kinds:
1 – Striving to learn the teachings of Islam without which one cannot attain success and happiness in this world or in the Hereafter; if this is missing then one is doomed to misery in this world and in the Hereafter.
2 – Striving to make oneself act in accordance with what one has learned. Simply knowing without acting, even though it may not cause any harm, is not going to bring any benefit.
3 – Striving to call others to Islam, teaching those who do not know about it. Otherwise one will be one of those who conceal that which Allaah has revealed of guidance and teaching, and it will not benefit him or save him from the punishment of Allaah.
4 – Striving to bear patiently the difficulties involved in calling people to Allaah and the insults of people; bearing all that for the sake of Allaah.
If a person achieves all these four levels, then he will be one of the rabbaaniyyeen (learned men of religion who practise what they know and also preach to others. Cf. Aal ‘Imraan 3:79). The salaf were agreed that the scholar does not deserve to be called a rabbaani unless he knows the truth, acts in accordance with it and teaches it to others. Whoever teaches, acts in accordance with his knowledge and has knowledge, he will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

Why aren’t all Muslims “Active” in the aggressive Jihad?

Fard al-Kifayah
Defines a communal obligation in Muslim legal doctrine. In juxtaposition to fard al-ayn, fard al-kifayah is a legal obligation that must be discharged by the Muslim community as a whole, such as military struggle; if enough members in the Muslim community discharge the obligation, the remaining Muslims are freed from the responsibility before God.

Jihad is obligatory and becomes fard ‘ayn if a person is present where fighting is going on. This is the first of the situations in which jihad becomes an individual obligation.

(Source: https://islamqa.info/en/20214 )

The Muslim protesters in Chicago cannot be described as those in Europe, however there were people of all ages.   Active protesters included: Older and younger, both men and women, even mothers who pushed their babies in strollers.

There was no visible sign of local police monitoring the protest and the News Media was conveniently absent. The protesters appeared to be nonviolent and there was no evidence of property destroyed (as seen in the video above).

As witnessed throughout the world, when Muslims turn out to protest, this is only the tip of the iceberg when considering their final agenda.

Follow The Quantum Liberty Blog

 

Current Issue Articles with Video, Pictures, Twitter Posts, and Controversial Perspectives.

Islam, The “New Face” of Women’s Rights

fullsizerender-7

It seems the Women’s rights movement has been “High-Jacked”! At first thought, you might ask yourself the question, “By whom?”

The American Women’s Rights movement has been in existence for nearly 170 years. Issues of the movement have included:

  • Married women were legally dead in the eyes of the law.
  • Women were not allowed to vote.
  • Women had to submit to laws when they had no voice in their formation.
  • Married women had no property rights.
  • Husbands had legal power over and responsibility for their wives to the extent that they could imprison or beat them with impunity.
  • Divorce and child custody laws favored men, giving no rights to women.
  • Women had to pay property taxes although they had no representation in the levying of these taxes.
  • Most occupations were closed to women and when women did work they were paid only a fraction of what men earned.
  • Women were not allowed to enter professions such as medicine or law.
  • Women had no means to gain an education since no college or university would accept women students.
  • With only a few exceptions, women were not allowed to participate in the affairs of the church.
  • Women were robbed of their self-confidence and self-respect, and were made totally dependent on men.  (source: Women’s History Project)

You’re in for a surprise when you discover more about the “Co-Organizer of January’s “Women’s March on Washington”. Surprisingly, all of these issues (above) have been addressed and ratified!  However, there is still controversy regarding equal pay, and you can believe that issue is being addressed aggressively, as mentioned in a previous article published by: Quantum Liberty:  Ashley Judd says, “I am a nasty woman!”   

Just one day after Donald Trump’s Inauguration, a so-called “Women’s Rights March” was co-organized and sponsored by and Linda Sarsour (pictured below).

sarsour-isis linda-sarsour-tweets

Sarsour, as you can decide by her Twitter post, is not a champion of today’s “American Women’s Rights” but the agenda and ideology of Islam.

Sarsour’s Muslim views have been promoted by the official Women’s March on Twitter (below).

fullsizerender-6

(from the official “Women’s March Twitter account)

The March participants exuberantly expressed their support for Sarsour.  However, their support comes blindly and without research. While LGBTQ, Feminists and Abortion supporters raised their voices and hands in support as Sarsour addressed the crowd, they were totally oblivious to Sarsour’s true motivation.  Sarsour’s strategy is to take advantage of a crisis that will no doubt help to encourage the “un-knowing” to blindly support Islam and Sharia Law.

“Men are the maintainers of women” 

The harsh reality of Muslim beliefs are starkly contrasted with Western beliefs.  The theologies of Islam and Christianity, in particular, are worlds apart:

Quran 4:34 for example, “Men are the maintainers of women”, because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.” Contemporary translations sometimes water down the word ‘beat’, but it is the same one used in verse Quran 8:12; and clearly means ‘to strike’.

A “good muslim”, follows the Quran “religiously”.  These are considered common concessions for Muslims in the Quran.

Beatings are not the worst of female suffering.  Each year hundreds of Muslim women die in “honor killings”– murders by husbands or male relatives of women suspected of disobedience, usually a sexual indiscretion or marriage against the family’s wishes. Typically, the killers are punished lightly, if at all.  In Jordan a man who slays his wife or a close relative after catching her in the act of adultery is exempt from punishment.

The above brief summary, fails to even scratch the surface of a Muslim’s Sharia compliance and the push for its acceptance in the United States, but provides a small sampling of the agenda Linda Sarsour is feeding today’s new “American Feminists”.

President Trump, Being His Own Media Outlet

 

trumpsocialmedia

Many have voiced disconcerting comments of our 45th President’s practice of using Twitter and other forms of Social Media to inform the American public of issues and concerns.  Even before winning the November Presidential Election in 2016, the media fired shots at (then) Presidential Candidate Trump for utilizing Social Media to inform voters.

With the onslaught of what is now known as “FakeNews“, President Trump has taken measures to ensure the Media does not misconstrue his intentions, ideals or methods.  One of the first actions taken by President Trump was to move the Press Briefings from the main building of the White House to an adjacent building.  This, rest assured, sent a strong message to the Press Corps that was not received favorably.

The original intent regarding “Freedom of the Press” by the Framers of the Constitution is noted (below).

As the appeal to the inhabitants of Quebec, written by the First Continental Congress in 1774, shows:    The last right we shall mention regards the freedom of the press. The importance of this consists, besides the advancement of truth, science, morality, and arts in general, in its diffusion of liberal sentiments on the administration of Government, its ready communication of thoughts between subjects, and its consequential promotion of union among them, whereby oppressive officers are shamed or intimidated into more honorable and just modes of conducting affairs.

In addition to moving the Whitehouse Press briefings, President Trump has not been silent or shy about “calling-out” news outlets of which he considers to utilize deceptive or misleading tactics.  He has gone as far as to refer to CNN as a “Fake News” outlet.

The invention and free utilization of Social media (Facebook & Facebook Live, Twitter, Youtube and others) has provided abundant ways for the world to communicate at a moment’s notice.  It is no wonder that President Trump has made the decision to use this to properly inform the American public of his work.  The News Media has taken advantage of the method as well, by using Twitter & Facebook Live to promote and air coverage of important issues.

There are many tools our present day’s technology that are available for all to use, including the President of the United States.  In order to provide fair and balanced reporting of his activities, our President has made use of these technologies to ensure the American public is well informed and informed, properly.

Seattle Police Respond to Protesters

Seattle police respond to protesters at the Seattle Tacoma (Sea-Tac) Airport.

(Poll Questions Below)

fullsizerender-6

The “Moderate Muslim’s Manifesto”

fullsizerender-5

It has been with great sorrow to witness the deception of so many Americans and Europeans over the past years.  Deceptive tactics are not new in warfare or in the daily living practices of Islam.  It is very important for Americans to know and understand the tactics that have been used against them for many years and these tactics have increased exponentially in recent years.    

Let’s consider for a moment, probably the most dangerous and current issue Americans are faced with… “Terrorism“!

A recent video has been published touting the training of children by Isis groups (Video below).

Muslim children training to kill (courtesy of the Clarion Project) is nothing new.  Children have been used by terrorist groups for years to deliver suicide bombs to their enemies.  The only difference now, there is a blatant effort to aggressively train the most unsuspecting (children) category of fighter to accomplish the Islamist agenda (conquer and dominate).

Many Americans hold to the philosophy of, “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!” (this is a portion of a poem by Emma Lazarus, located on a plaque on the Statue of Liberty.)  The “mindset” of this portion of the poem is genuine and charitable when considering the great needs others may have.  However, there is a greater need to consider the safety and security of American citizens!

Many Americans find Islam and Muslims to be honest, truthful and genuine in their intentions.  Many Americans even consider Islam to be “conservative” and compatible with the “conservative” views found in the Republican Party.  Conservative Islamic views are only conservative when considering the ideology and philosophy found in the Koran. Most Americans are unaware and unlearned regarding the actual facts of the Islamic religion and its intent to conquer and dominate.

Taqiyya, is a term used in the Koran which facilitates Deception and Lying to those who do not follow Islamic beliefs or the Koran.

Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to “smooth over differences.”
There are several forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, the best known being taqiyya. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause of Islam – in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.

Note:  Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them. There are two forms:

Taqiyya – Saying something that isn’t true as it relates to the Muslim identity.

Kitman – Lying by omission. An example would be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32 (that if anyone kills “it shall be as if he had killed all mankind”) while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate murder in undefined cases of “corruption” and “mischief.”

Tawriya – Intentionally creating a false impression.

Muruna – ‘Blending in’ by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others.

While reading this article, the reader must consider the idea allergy behind Islam.  Islam’s ideology cannot be compared with that of Judeo Christian values or ideology.  The ultimate goal of Islam is to facilitate the reign of Allah and Islam throughout the world.

The refugee and immigrant influx from the Middle East has an agenda…It’s part of a multi prong strategy which is contained in the “moderate Muslim manifesto“.  Initially the people that came into our country were supposedly peaceful and just wanting to find a better place to make a living. (those people are doctors, lawyers, business owners and individuals who are seeking political office.). Then, there were hordes of young men, men of the right age of soldiers in the army (these men came without families, with no other apparent reason for coming other than to leave their home country and relocate here), as of late there have been women and children entering our country (Women and children who could very well have possibly been trained to carry out aggressive behavior as in the video you posted).

Now ponder this for a moment, who is going to defend themselves against a child (seemingly innocent and not a danger to anyone) with the gun? Who is going to feel as if they need to defend themselves against a woman?  There is a core “American & Christian belief” that women are harmless and should be protected?

w

I submit to you: Many of these women & children are already here along with the support group who will assist them when the time comes to carry out horrific acts of murder and assault on the American people.  All this, in an effort to further the Islamic/Muslim beliefs and agenda, which include conquering with complete and utter domination.

%d bloggers like this: