By TK Whiteman – February 9, 2017 (ConservativeFiringLine.com)
With updates slowly but steadily percolating to the surface, it’s being made public to the American people that three Pakistani-Muslim brothers are under investigation by the US Capitol Police.
But the trio aren’t under investigation for anything as mundane as spitting on the sidewalk or walking on the grass.
Tucker Carlson’s The Daily Caller (TDC) is reporting that the brothers Imran, Jamal and Abid Awan are being investigated for “accessing [Congressional] members’ computer networks without their knowledge and stealing equipment from Congress.”
Also noted the TDC;
Capitol Police spokeswoman Eva Malecki said the investigation was still ongoing, and arrests have not been made but staff were “asked to update their security settings.”
Other than a criminal investigation of illegally accessing the computer systems of a yet to be disclosed number of members of congress as well as theft of government property, the Brothers Awan are also under the microscope for who in exactly in Congress hired them.
And that list of Congressmen and women is of some rather high profile lawmakers.
FrontPage Magazine has published; (Emphasis mine)
All three of the Pakistani brothers had been employed by Democrats. The offices that employed them included HPSCI minority members Speier, Carson and Joaquín Castro. Congressman Castro, who also sits on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, utilized the services of Jamal Moiz Awan. Speier and Carson’s offices utilized Imran Awan.
Abid A. Awan was employed by Lois Frankel and Ted Lieu: members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Also on the committee is Castro. As is Robin Kelly whose office employed Jamal Awan. Lieu also sits on the subcommittees on National Security and Information Technology of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Tammy Duckworth’s office had also employed Abid. Before Duckworth successfully played on the sympathy of voters to become Senator Tammy Duckworth, she had been on the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces of the Armed Services Committee.
Gwen Graham, who had also been on the Armed Services Committee and on the Tactical Air and Land Forces subcommittee, had employed Jamal Awan. Jamal was also employed by Cedric Richmond’s office. Richmond sits on the Committee on Homeland Security and on its Terrorism and Cybersecurity subcommittee. He is a ranking member of the latter subcommittee. Also employing Jamal was Mark Takano of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Imran had worked for the office of John Sarbanes who sits on the House Energy and Commerce Committee that oversees, among other things, the nuclear industry. Other members of the Committee employing the brothers included Yvette Clarke, who also sits on the Bipartisan Encryption Working Group, Diana DeGette, Dave Loebsack and Tony Cardenas.
But finally there’s Andre Carson.
Carson is the second Muslim in Congress and the first Muslim on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and, more critically, is the ranking member on its Emerging Threats Subcommittee. He is also a member of the Department of Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture Subcommittee.
Yet another somewhat disconcerting tidbit TDC cited;
Jamal, who public records suggest is only 22 years old and first began working in the House when he was 20, was paid nearly $160,000 a year, or three times the average House IT staff salary, according to InsideGov, which tracks congressional salaries. Abid was paid $161,000 and Imran $165,000.
Despite the three receiving abnormally high paychecks for services rendered, they did beat the high price of living in the DC area by all living under the same roof.
But even that left more questions than answers;
Abid, Imran and Jamal have all shared a house in Lorton, Virginia, that is owned by Hina R. Alvi [who just happens to be Imran Awan’s wife]. Alvi is a female House IT employee who works for many of the same members as the three brothers, as well as the House Democratic Caucus.
In a separate article from TDC, reporter Luke Rosiak cites even more troubling factual information. Specifically, despite the three having very chequered pasts, how in the world did they manage to pass the background checks needed to work on Capitol Hill?
As reported, the three brothers and wife “have a history of massive debts and bankruptcy, a fondness for fast cars and real estate, and unusually complicated webs of intertwined finances”
Despite the generous salaries, the four were involved in multiple suspicious mortgage transfers and a debt-evading bankruptcy. Abid had more than $1 million in debts following a failed business called Cars International that he ran in Falls Church, Va., from November 2009 to September 2010. Business associates said in court documents that Abid had stolen money and vehicles from them.
Article by: By TK Whiteman – February 9, 2017 (ConservativeFiringLine.com)
Reminiscent of marches in Europe, thousands of Muslims protested in downtown Chicago, against America and Israel. As seen in the video (above), this was a very well organized event. Protesters carried, signs and waved flags representative of Iraq and Turkey. What looked to be draped in a, Iraqi flag, was a coffin being carried by protesters. (Please note: This event is from July 2014, which should cause any liberty minded American great concern as to the progression of organization after only 2 years have passed.)
Chants lead by a man over a loudspeaker included: “Muslim, Muslim don’t you cry…(inaudible response)”, “Free, Free Palestine…(inaudible response)” along with other inaudible chants. But regardless, the mood illustrated was a definite disdain with Israel and the United States.
We have learned and must acknowledge that Jihad comes in many forms and fashions. As evidenced in this video, Jihad has definitely come to Chicago, Illinois
To further understand why massive protests are beginning now and have not been a notable occurrence in the past, we must first understand the ideology, when and how Muslims are called to Jihad.
Definitions to understand:
Mustahabb (Arabic: مستحبّ /mustaḥabb/, literally “recommended”) is an Islamic term referring to recommended, favored or virtuous actions. Mustahabb actions are those whose status of approval in Islamic law (ahkam) falls between mubah (neither encouraged nor discouraged) and wajib (compulsory).
Kafir (Arabic: كافر kāfir; plural كفّار kuffār; feminine كافرة kāfirah) is an Arabic term (from the root K-F-R “to cover”) “unbeliever”, “disbeliever”, or “infidel”. It is used as a derogatory term.
In Islam, shirk (Arabic: شرك širk) is the sin of practicing idolatry or polytheism, i.e. the deification or worship of anyone or anything other than the singular God i.e. Allah. Literally, it means the establishment of “partners” placed beside God. It is the vice that is opposed to the virtue of Tawhid (monotheism).
Fard or its synonym wājib (واجب) is one of the five types of Ahkam into which Fiqh categorizes acts of every Muslim. The Hanafi Fiqh however makes a distinction between Wajib and Fard, the latter being obligatory and the former merely necessary.
Jihad is of various kinds, some of which are obligatory upon everyone who is accountable, and some are obligatory upon the community as a whole. if some people undertake them then the rest are relieved of the obligation. And some kinds of jihad are mustahabb.
Jihad al-nafs (jihad against one’s self) and jihad al-Shaytaan (jihad against the Shaytaan) are obligatory upon everyone who is accountable. Jihad against the munaafiqeen (hypocrites), kaafirs (disbelievers) and leaders of oppression and innovation is obligatory upon the community as a whole. Physical jihad (i.e. fighting) against the kaafirs may become an individual obligation upon everyone who is able to do it in certain circumstances, which will be described below.
Ibn al-Qayyim said:
Once this is understood, then jihad is of four kinds: Jihad al-nafs (jihad against one’s self), jihad al-Shaytaan (jihad against the Shaytaan), jihad against the kaafirs and jihad against the hypocrites.
Jihad al-nafs (jihad against one’s self) is of four kinds:
1 – Striving to learn the teachings of Islam without which one cannot attain success and happiness in this world or in the Hereafter; if this is missing then one is doomed to misery in this world and in the Hereafter.
2 – Striving to make oneself act in accordance with what one has learned. Simply knowing without acting, even though it may not cause any harm, is not going to bring any benefit.
3 – Striving to call others to Islam, teaching those who do not know about it. Otherwise one will be one of those who conceal that which Allaah has revealed of guidance and teaching, and it will not benefit him or save him from the punishment of Allaah.
4 – Striving to bear patiently the difficulties involved in calling people to Allaah and the insults of people; bearing all that for the sake of Allaah.
If a person achieves all these four levels, then he will be one of the rabbaaniyyeen (learned men of religion who practise what they know and also preach to others. Cf. Aal ‘Imraan 3:79). The salaf were agreed that the scholar does not deserve to be called a rabbaani unless he knows the truth, acts in accordance with it and teaches it to others. Whoever teaches, acts in accordance with his knowledge and has knowledge, he will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Why aren’t all Muslims “Active” in the aggressive Jihad?
Defines a communal obligation in Muslim legal doctrine. In juxtaposition to fard al-ayn, fard al-kifayah is a legal obligation that must be discharged by the Muslim community as a whole, such as military struggle; if enough members in the Muslim community discharge the obligation, the remaining Muslims are freed from the responsibility before God.
Jihad is obligatory and becomes fard ‘ayn if a person is present where fighting is going on. This is the first of the situations in which jihad becomes an individual obligation.
(Source: https://islamqa.info/en/20214 )
The Muslim protesters in Chicago cannot be described as those in Europe, however there were people of all ages. Active protesters included: Older and younger, both men and women, even mothers who pushed their babies in strollers.
There was no visible sign of local police monitoring the protest and the News Media was conveniently absent. The protesters appeared to be nonviolent and there was no evidence of property destroyed (as seen in the video above).
As witnessed throughout the world, when Muslims turn out to protest, this is only the tip of the iceberg when considering their final agenda.
It seems the Women’s rights movement has been “High-Jacked”! At first thought, you might ask yourself the question, “By whom?”
The American Women’s Rights movement has been in existence for nearly 170 years. Issues of the movement have included:
- Married women were legally dead in the eyes of the law.
- Women were not allowed to vote.
- Women had to submit to laws when they had no voice in their formation.
- Married women had no property rights.
- Husbands had legal power over and responsibility for their wives to the extent that they could imprison or beat them with impunity.
- Divorce and child custody laws favored men, giving no rights to women.
- Women had to pay property taxes although they had no representation in the levying of these taxes.
- Most occupations were closed to women and when women did work they were paid only a fraction of what men earned.
- Women were not allowed to enter professions such as medicine or law.
- Women had no means to gain an education since no college or university would accept women students.
- With only a few exceptions, women were not allowed to participate in the affairs of the church.
- Women were robbed of their self-confidence and self-respect, and were made totally dependent on men. (source: Women’s History Project)
You’re in for a surprise when you discover more about the “Co-Organizer of January’s “Women’s March on Washington”. Surprisingly, all of these issues (above) have been addressed and ratified! However, there is still controversy regarding equal pay, and you can believe that issue is being addressed aggressively, as mentioned in a previous article published by: Quantum Liberty: Ashley Judd says, “I am a nasty woman!”
Just one day after Donald Trump’s Inauguration, a so-called “Women’s Rights March” was co-organized and sponsored by and Linda Sarsour (pictured below).
Sarsour, as you can decide by her Twitter post, is not a champion of today’s “American Women’s Rights” but the agenda and ideology of Islam.
Sarsour’s Muslim views have been promoted by the official Women’s March on Twitter (below).
The March participants exuberantly expressed their support for Sarsour. However, their support comes blindly and without research. While LGBTQ, Feminists and Abortion supporters raised their voices and hands in support as Sarsour addressed the crowd, they were totally oblivious to Sarsour’s true motivation. Sarsour’s strategy is to take advantage of a crisis that will no doubt help to encourage the “un-knowing” to blindly support Islam and Sharia Law.
“Men are the maintainers of women”
The harsh reality of Muslim beliefs are starkly contrasted with Western beliefs. The theologies of Islam and Christianity, in particular, are worlds apart:
Quran 4:34 for example, “Men are the maintainers of women”, because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.” Contemporary translations sometimes water down the word ‘beat’, but it is the same one used in verse Quran 8:12; and clearly means ‘to strike’.
A “good muslim”, follows the Quran “religiously”. These are considered common concessions for Muslims in the Quran.
Beatings are not the worst of female suffering. Each year hundreds of Muslim women die in “honor killings”– murders by husbands or male relatives of women suspected of disobedience, usually a sexual indiscretion or marriage against the family’s wishes. Typically, the killers are punished lightly, if at all. In Jordan a man who slays his wife or a close relative after catching her in the act of adultery is exempt from punishment.
The above brief summary, fails to even scratch the surface of a Muslim’s Sharia compliance and the push for its acceptance in the United States, but provides a small sampling of the agenda Linda Sarsour is feeding today’s new “American Feminists”.